保护动物 的英文
你问的这是动词短语呢？还是名词短语？
名词短语的话可以是：animal protection,animal conservation（这个比较正式）
动词短语：save animals,protect animals
看你是什么语境了。自己选吧
帮我翻译一句话（英文） 停止大量捕杀动物,禁止破坏自然的和谐,生灵平等
Stop Killing the animals!Do not destroy the harmony of nature.Every livingthings are equal.
他主张野生动物应该留在野外生活，而不是被用于娱乐或广告翻译
He proposes that wild animals should remain wild and should not be used for entertaining or advertising.
用英语列举五条保护动物的措施
Animals Need Protecting Animals are natural resources that peop le have wasted all through our history. A nimals have been killed for their fur and feathers, for food, for sport, and simply because they were in the way. Thousan ds of kinds of animals have disappeare d from the earth forever. Hundreds more are on the danger list today. About 170 kinds in the United States aloneare cons idered in danger. Why should people care? Because we n eed animals, and because once they are gone, there will never be any more.Anim als are more than just beautiful or intere sting. They are more than just a source of food. Every animal has its place in the balance of nature. Destroying one kind of animal can create many problems. Fo r example, when farmers killed large nu mbers of hawks, the farmers' stores of c orn and grain were destroyed by rats an d mice. Why? Because hawks eat rats a nd mice, with no hawks to keep down th eir numbers, the rats and mice multiplie d quickly. Luckily, some people are working to hel p save the animals. Some groups raise money to let people know about the pro blem. And they try to get the governmen ts to pass laws protecting animals in da nger. Quite a few countries have passed laws. These laws forbid the killing of an y animal or planton the danger list. Slow ly, the number of some animals in dang er is growing.
中文: 动物需要保护 动物是自然资源，在整个历史过程中，人 类一直在糟蹋着这种资源。人们杀死动物 ，获得它们的皮毛，把它们当作食物或运 动方式，或者只是因为它们碍事。成千上 万种动物已经从这个地球上永远地消失了 。现在另外上百种动物也上了濒危动物名 单。仅荚国大概就有170种被认为处于危 险当中。 为什么人们应该感到担忧呢?因为 我们需 要动物，因为它们一旦消失，就永远不会
它们
再出现。动物不仅仅是漂亮或有趣。
不仅仅是人类的食物来源。在维持自然平 衡中，每种动物都有其作用。毁灭某种动 物会导致许多问题。比如，农民们如果杀 死为数众多的鹰，他们谷物和粮食的仓库 就会受到老鼠和田鼠的破坏。 为什么?因 为鹰吃鼠类，没有鹰控制它们的数量，鼠 类就会迅速繁殖。 幸运的是，有些人正在努力帮助拯救这些 动物。有些组织筹钱以便人们了解这一问 题。他们也努力使政府通过保护濒危动物 的法律。很多国家已经通过了法律。这些 法律禁止杀害濒危名单上的动植物。某些 濒危动物的数目正在慢慢地不断上升。
为什么反对用动物来作为娱乐？ 求意见 求答案
评《反虐待动物法专家建议稿》的立法价值冲突
近期有报载：“《反虐待动物法专家建议稿》正在向公众征求意见，其中违法食用或者销售猫狗肉者最高可被罚款5000元并被拘留15天的提法在社会上引发巨大反响。”对此，人们众议纷纷。支持者主要认为，动物也有生存的权利，人们应该保护动物的生命权。反对者主要基于几个观点：一是立法保护公平性不足。对于该草案仅保护少数动物，而不保护多数动物。二是即使是对于某些法草案中保护的动物，也因用途不同而异，不能一刀切。三是我国的风俗，尤其是各地的风俗不统一，此法不符合我国的社会现状。
《反虐待动物法》的制定呼声，在近几年愈来愈多。其直接起因是由于网上虐待动物的视频越来越多，使公众在道德上对此感到愤慨。在法律限制自由的原则中，有一项叫“冒犯原则”，即法律可基于某些冒犯社会公共情操的行为而限制自由，比较典型的是对色情淫乱行为的限制。而《反虐待动物法》制定的伦理价值，也是基于此而行的。
《反虐待动物法》制定的另一个有利的依据，是在某些大陆法系的国家，如德国，也有类似的法律出现。这对于同属于大陆法系的中国，是一种非常好的借鉴。因此，从法的移植角度观之，对《反虐待动物法》的移植，似乎能比较好地融入现行的法律系统。
但从法的移植角度而言，这种移植并非一定符合我国国情。我国地大物博，民族众多，各地文化差异很大，对于人与动物的关系，很难一概而论。同时，西方国家猫狗的宠物文化渊源颇深，而我国相对而言起步较迟，人们观念对此的接受程度仍属未知数。因此，一到切的做法，难以可行。
从价值观念而言，对于“天赋人权”的问题，似乎世界各国都基本达成共识，且可从理性出发对此制定法律保护。但对于动物生存权，是否天而赋之，暂未有较多的观点与定论。因此，对于同属于从理性出发立法的大陆法系的中国而言，此立法是否符合本国理性仍有待讨论。
从微观的立法技术而言，《反虐待动物法专家建议稿》中有两个核心概念大家仍在争论不休，而这种争论是大家分歧的关键。首先，什么是“动物”？立法对需保护的“动物”的概念非常模糊。为什么动物又不能一视同仁？如何又能说明区别对待动物是符合立法的理性？其次，如何定义“虐待”？吃动物是虐待吗？还是残忍地把它们弄死是虐待？从立法的导火梭——虐猫虐狗的视频来看，人们对此法立法的呼声显然是基于后者。由于这些视频过于“血腥与暴力”，因此挑战了公众情操。但当然，对“残忍”的界定还是另一个问题。
价值的冲突，立法技术的缺陷，反映出《反虐待动物法专家建议稿》的社会分歧。在此基础上，笔者建议，希望能从“公众情操”的角度考虑此问题，能从禁止“暴力”的角度去解决此问题。对于是否可以吃动物、为什么选择性保护动物这些问题，由于国情文化、以致理性及立法技术的问题存在，大可不必下定论。
关于保护动物的英文名言。
agree that animal has its rights as human rights, are as. This is the kind of expansion.——The United States President Lincoln.
我赞同动物均有其权利，如同人类均有人权一样。这才是扩充仁心之道。 ——美国总统林肯
A nation's moral is great, can from the animal 's attitude to see.——India Mahatma Gandhi
一个国家的道德是否伟大，可以从其对动物的态度看出。——印度圣雄甘地
A pair of animal cruelty, also will become the human cruelty.——Thomas, equinox.
一个对动物残忍的人，也会变得对人类残忍。— 汤玛斯．艾奎纳
满意望采纳。
关于保护动物的英文短语（急）
Many wild animals are facing the danger of extinction, because the environment that they are living in has changed greatly. For example, with the developmet of cities, the using of insecticide and serious pollution, their living areas have become narrowcr and narrower. Many of the wild animals, now are confronted with food crisis. At the same time, man is killing off species just for getting their fur, skin, horns, teeth and meat.
In order to protect our resources of ecology, people should realize that the loss of any species is at least the loss of source of knowledge and a source of natural beauty. There fore, measures of the following should be taken: pollution standards are made to keepdown poisons; killing off certain rare species is prohibited; national parks should be set up as wild life, reserves.
Only if we human beings take some drastic measures can wild animals be preserved.
保护野生动物
许多野生动物正面临绝种的危险，因为它们生活的环境发生了极大的变化。譬 如，随着城市的发展，杀虫剂的使用和严重的污染，野生动物的生活区域变得越来越狭小。许多野生动物目前正面临着食物方面的危机。同时，为了获取野生动物的毛、皮、角、牙齿和肉，人类正在屠杀野生动物。
为了保护生态资源，人们应当意识到任何物种的缺失，至少意味着知识资源和自然美的缺失。因此，应采取以下措施：制订污染标准以降低有毒物质；严禁杀害某些稀有物种；应建立国家公园作为野生动植物保护区。
我们只有采取一些有力措施，才能保护野生动物。
Version 104 Wild animals have no place in the 21st century, and the protection for them is a waste of resource. To what extent do you agree with the above statement?
With the rapid progress of society, people's living standard is dramatically improved, with more convenience and resource coming to us. However, our living environment at the same time is getting more polluted. One effect of this phenomenon is that there are not enough space for wild animals to survive, and many people hold an opinion that it would be a waste of resource to protect wild animals. Nevertheless, I think exactly the opposite way.
The environment is a comprehensively biological life cycle, with human beings, animals and plants playing effecting each other accordingly. Wild animals occupy an essential position in the life cycle. Let's look at a very simple example. Although snakes are very dangerous and frightening, they can catch mice, and mice can destroy the crop as well as the sanitary surroundings. Here it is easy to understand that if there are not enough snakes, the number of mice would grow rapidly, doing more harm to us. Then, shouldn't we protect the snake? Actually, we are saving resource by doing this because trying to save something which is already destroyed seriously costs more.
Secondly, in present, quite a number of problems such as desertification and rivers dried up, caused by excessive exploitation of natural resource, have arisen an increasing number of people aware of environment protection. More and more places, I think, should be planned for wild animals in the 21st century. Thus, it is obviously noticed that more trees are planted and more wildlife conservation areas are planned , ensuring that wild animals will be under protection. As we can see from the improvement, in the 21st century, wild animals would be leading a happy